PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

KURIKULA: jurnal Pendidikan is a peer-reviewed journal on education in the Muslim world. This journal is published by the Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Ngawi and will be published twice one year on March and September, available in Print and Online.  Editors welcome scholars, researchers, and practitioners of education around the world to submit scholarly articles to be published in this journal. All articles will be reviewed by experts before accepted for publication. Each author is solely responsible for the content of published articles.

Plagiarism Checker

The article that can be reviewed by editor board after completing the attachment of plagiarism checker and stated that article at least 80% is origin. The following are the tools of checker:

  1. Grammarly
  2. Plagiarism Checker
  3. Turnitin

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of a journal in a peer-reviewed Kurikula Jurnal Pendidikan is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society. Faculty of  Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Ngawi was publisher of Jurnal Kurikula takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Dicision of Publication Kurikula Jurnal Pendidikan

The editors of Kurikula Jurnal Pendidikan are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted should be published. Validation of the work and the centrality of the researcher and the reader should always encourage these decisions. The editor can be guided by the policies of the board of editors of journals and restricted by law must be upheld as concerns defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can negotiate with the other editor or the assessment team in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

The Editors of Kurikula Jurnal  Pendidikan always rate a script based on their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

Secrecy

The editors of Kurikula Jurnal  Pendidikan and staff editors must not disclose any information regarding the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, expert editors, bestari partners and publishers.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

The materials disclosed in unpublished manuscript submitted should not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author clear.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.